In summary of the evaluation of the video footage it has to be concluded that the visor had damages at the time of the official finding on 18.10.04 which
a) could not have been caused when the ferry was in service, and
b) could not have been sustained during the casualty sequence-of-events.
In combination with the explanations in Chapter 3.2 – “Why the visor was lying close to the wreck” – there are very strong indications that the visor had been moved from a position very close or even in contact with the wreck to a position at some distance from the wreck. |